"And the proof that women always act reasonably," I retorted, "is that they never give you the reason." Instead of taking that for the flippancy it was, she thought about it for some minutes; or else it reminded her of something. "Besides," I went on, "this is an adventure, as far as it goes; a little one, if you like, but still with all the earmarks of romance. It was unexpected, and it fits into itself perfectly—all the parts of the scene match like a picture-puzzle—and it happened through a mixture of chance and the taking of[Pg 11] chances. It's just that snatching at casual excitement that makes things happen to people." [Pg 11] "Don't things enough happen to people without their seeking them out?" she asked. "Not to most people; and not nowadays, if they ever did. Do you remember Humpty Dumpty's objection to Alice's face, that it was just like other faces—two eyes above, nose in the middle, mouth under? Well, that's the only objection I have to life; days and doings are too regular, too much according to schedule. Why is a train less romantic than a stage-coach? Because it runs on time and on a track; it can't do anything but be late. But the stage-coach dallies along through the countryside, with inns and highwaymen, and pretty girls driving geese to market, and all the chances of the open road. The horse of the knight-errant was better still, and for the same reason." "I don't think anything very much has ever happened to you," she said slowly. "Well," said I, "I'm not pretending to be Ulysses; and you've reminded me of my tender age so often that I can hardly forget it in your presence. But I have had a few exciting moments, and I want more. I don't care whether they are pleasant or not, so[Pg 12] long as I come safe out of them somehow. They'll pay for themselves with the gold of memory." [Pg 12] "That's just what I mean," she returned. "You talk about things as if the only question of importance were whether they are exciting. One looks at books that way, and pictures, and things that are not real. A moment ago, you put highwaymen in the same class with inns and goose-girls. Do you suppose any one that was actually held up and robbed of his fortune would think of the robber as merely a pleasant thrill?" "I'd rather be robbed by a highwayman than by a railroad, anyway.