me in the slightest degree. It is no breach of professional confidence to say that, in my interviews with him, he has doggedly refused to give me any information concerning himself; but as I have before asserted that poverty and wretchedness were not to be accepted as marks of guilt, so I now declare that the prisoner’s strange reticence concerning himself is also no crime. Nor is eccentricity a crime. I have had no opportunity of conversing with the prisoner this morning, or of seeing him before I entered the court a few minutes since, and I have to ask the meaning of those marks upon his face—to[54] which I direct your worship’s attention—and of his being handcuffed. [53] [54] The police explained that on his way to Martin Street police court the prisoner had attempted to escape, and that a struggle had taken place, during which a constable and the prisoner had received several blows. Mr. Goldberry asked if the constable who had been struck was present, and the answer was given that he was not; he was on duty in another place. Mr. Goldberry: I will not comment upon the occurrence; in the marks upon the prisoner’s face, and in the absence of the constable who is said to have been struck, it speaks for itself. I strenuously oppose the application for a remand, and I demand the prisoner’s discharge on the plain grounds that there is no evidence against him. Mr. White Lush: In the interests of justice, I ask for a further remand. Mr. Reardon: Am I to understand that if I remand the prisoner until this day week, you will be prepared to bring forward evidence[55] which will justify not only his present but his past detention? [55] Mr. White Lush: I am informed that such evidence will be forthcoming. Mr. Reardon: Upon that understanding the prisoner is remanded until this day week. [56] [56] CHAPTER VI.
Prev.
Back
Top